Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs i7-2920XM Extreme
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 553 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 84.50 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 9 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,096 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 216 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1160 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket G2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.598 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon 760M |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.66 | 14.95 |
| Recency | 9 January 2011 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has 2165.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2920XM Extreme and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
