Phenom II X2 560 BE vs i7-2840QM
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1758 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
Power efficiency | 5.09 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Callisto (2009−2010) |
Release date | 4 September 2011 (13 years ago) | 21 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 24 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 216 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 1160 Million | 758 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | Socket G2 | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.598 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 September 2011 | 21 September 2010 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 80 Watt |
i7-2840QM has an age advantage of 11 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 77.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-2840QM is a notebook processor while Phenom II X2 560 BE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2840QM and Phenom II X2 560 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.