Core 2 Duo T9500 vs Core i7-2760QM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2760QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.82
+145%
Core 2 Duo T9500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.15

Core i7-2760QM outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16832380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency5.823.05
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$530

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size216 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1160 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1224,FCPGA988BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2760QM 2.82
+145%
Core 2 Duo T9500 1.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2760QM 4399
+145%
Core 2 Duo T9500 1799

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2760QM 540
+60.2%
Core 2 Duo T9500 337

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2760QM 1640
+199%
Core 2 Duo T9500 549

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-2760QM 4474
+51.7%
Core 2 Duo T9500 2950

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-2760QM 16211
+199%
Core 2 Duo T9500 5419

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-2760QM 6001
+155%
Core 2 Duo T9500 2352

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.82 1.15
Recency 4 September 2011 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i7-2760QM has a 145.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T9500, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2760QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T9500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2760QM and Core 2 Duo T9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2760QM
Core i7-2760QM
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Core 2 Duo T9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 289 votes

Rate Core i7-2760QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 190 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2760QM or Core 2 Duo T9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.