M3-8100Y vs i7-2740QM
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Core M3 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Amber Lake (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 4 September 2011 (13 years ago) | 28 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | OPI |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 23 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 216 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1160 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket G2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.598 GB/s | 29.861 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 10 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.66 | 1.98 |
| Recency | 4 September 2011 | 28 August 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 5 Watt |
i7-2740QM has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
M3-8100Y, on the other hand, has 200% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2740QM and M3-8100Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
