i7-11700F vs i7-2715QE

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2715QE
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.03
Core i7-11700F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.21
+551%

Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i7-2715QE by a whopping 551% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1906562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency4.2719.23
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA1023FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2715QE 2.03
i7-11700F 13.21
+551%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2715QE 3221
i7-11700F 20989
+552%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 13.21
Recency 3 January 2011 16 March 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i7-2715QE has 44.4% lower power consumption.

i7-11700F, on the other hand, has a 550.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-11700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2715QE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2715QE is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2715QE
Core i7-2715QE
Intel Core i7-11700F
Core i7-11700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2715QE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 965 votes

Rate Core i7-11700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2715QE or Core i7-11700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.