Celeron M 722 vs i7-2715QE
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1904 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 4.27 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 3 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 800 MHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 216 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,160 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | VGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.598 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 January 2011 | 1 October 2008 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 5 Watt |
i7-2715QE has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2715QE and Celeron M 722, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
