A8-4500M vs i7-2710QE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2710QE
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.64
+140%

Core i7-2710QE outperforms A8-4500M by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17342413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD A-Series
Power efficiency5.352.87
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1160 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600unknown
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2710QE 2.64
+140%
A8-4500M 1.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2710QE 4044
+139%
A8-4500M 1689

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.64 1.10
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.19
Recency 3 January 2011 15 May 2012
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i7-2710QE has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A8-4500M, on the other hand, has 80.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2710QE is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-4500M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2710QE and A8-4500M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2710QE
Core i7-2710QE
AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2710QE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 315 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2710QE or A8-4500M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.