Atom C3508 vs i7-2677M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2677M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.20
+6.2%
Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.13

Core i7-2677M outperforms Atom C3508 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23322384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency6.689.51
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date27 June 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1816
L1 cache128 KB224 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cache4 MB8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size8.01 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2677M 1.20
+6.2%
Atom C3508 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2677M 1912
+6.5%
Atom C3508 1796

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.13
Recency 27 June 2011 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 11 Watt

i7-2677M has a 6.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 54.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508.

Be aware that Core i7-2677M is a notebook processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2677M and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2677M
Core i7-2677M
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2677M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2677M or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.