FX-9800P vs i7-2675QM

Place in the ranking	1760	2089
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Core i7	AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	5.10	10.09
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	4 September 2011 (13 years ago)	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$378	no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.1 GHz	3.6 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	22	no data
L1 cache	256 KB	320 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB (per module)
L3 cache	6 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Die size	216 mm²	250 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	1160 Million	3,100 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCBGA1224	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333	DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size	16 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 3000	AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.2 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2675QM 2.47
+51.5%

FX-9800P 1.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2675QM 3852
+51.5%

FX-9800P 2543

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2675QM 446

FX-9800P 496
+11.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2675QM 1412
+26.2%

FX-9800P 1119

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.47	1.63
Integrated graphics card	0.66	1.95
Recency	4 September 2011	31 May 2016
Threads	8	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	15 Watt

i7-2675QM has a 51.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

FX-9800P, on the other hand, has 195.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2675QM is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2675QM and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.