i3-13100F vs i7-2675QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2675QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.43
Core i3-13100F
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 58 Watt
9.21
+279%

Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i7-2675QM by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1762830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.03
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency5.1115.03
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size216 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1224FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2675QM 2.43
i3-13100F 9.21
+279%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2675QM 3856
i3-13100F 14626
+279%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2675QM 446
i3-13100F 2283
+412%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2675QM 1412
i3-13100F 7720
+447%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 9.21
Recency 12 October 2011 4 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 58 Watt

i7-2675QM has 28.9% lower power consumption.

i3-13100F, on the other hand, has a 279% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 years.

The Core i3-13100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2675QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2675QM is a notebook processor while Core i3-13100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2675QM and Core i3-13100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
Intel Core i3-13100F
Core i3-13100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2675QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 854 votes

Rate Core i3-13100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2675QM or Core i3-13100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.