Apple M1 vs i7-2675QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2675QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.43

Apple M1 outperforms Core i7-2675QM by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2675QM and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17771204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency5.11no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2675QM and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2675QM and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1224no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2675QM and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2675QM and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2675QM and M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2675QM and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2675QM and M1 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2675QM and M1.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2675QM 2.43
Apple M1 5.17
+113%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2675QM 3856
Apple M1 8207
+113%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 5.17
Integrated graphics card 0.66 14.05
Recency 12 October 2011 10 November 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 112.8% higher aggregate performance score, 2028.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2675QM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2675QM and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2675QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2256 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2675QM or M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.