Atom x5-Z8300 vs i7-2655LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2655LE
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.26
+147%

Core i7-2655LE outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23102879
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i75x Intel Atom
Power efficiency4.77no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release dateno data2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.84 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataUTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2655LE 1.26
+147%
Atom x5-Z8300 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2655LE 1999
+145%
Atom x5-Z8300 817

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.51
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.77
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

i7-2655LE has a 147.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-Z8300, on the other hand, has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-2655LE is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2655LE and Atom x5-Z8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2655LE
Core i7-2655LE
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Atom x5-Z8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Core i7-2655LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2655LE or Atom x5-Z8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.