Ryzen 7 8700F vs i7-2649M

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.96
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiencyno data28.61
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size149 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023AM5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2011 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

i7-2649M has 160% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i7-2649M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2649M and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2649M
Core i7-2649M
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-2649M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 163 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2649M or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.