Celeron G3930 vs i7-2635QM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2635QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.26
+53.7%

Core i7-2635QM outperforms Celeron G3930 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18362189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.69
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.582.63
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier2029
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1160 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1224FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2635QM 2.26
+53.7%
Celeron G3930 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2635QM 3459
+53.8%
Celeron G3930 2249

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2635QM 446
Celeron G3930 605
+35.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2635QM 1383
+33.8%
Celeron G3930 1034

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 1.47
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.85
Recency 3 January 2011 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 51 Watt

i7-2635QM has a 53.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron G3930, on the other hand, has 180.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-2635QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2635QM is a notebook processor while Celeron G3930 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2635QM and Celeron G3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2635QM
Core i7-2635QM
Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2635QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 237 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2635QM or Celeron G3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.