Celeron 3965U vs i7-2630QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2630QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.24
+106%
Celeron 3965U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.09

Core i7-2630QM outperforms Celeron 3965U by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18332417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.716.88
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$107

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0OPI
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplier2022
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1160 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PPGA988FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz900 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2630QM 2.24
+106%
Celeron 3965U 1.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2630QM 3561
+106%
Celeron 3965U 1732

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2630QM 441
Celeron 3965U 442
+0.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2630QM 1378
+74.4%
Celeron 3965U 790

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.24 1.09
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.85
Recency 3 January 2011 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

i7-2630QM has a 105.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron 3965U, on the other hand, has 180.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2630QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3965U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2630QM and Celeron 3965U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2630QM
Core i7-2630QM
Intel Celeron 3965U
Celeron 3965U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 500 votes

Rate Core i7-2630QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3965U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2630QM or Celeron 3965U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.