i7-13700F vs i7-2629M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.06
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiencyno data35.71
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$311$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8.01 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 24
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

i7-2629M has 160% lower power consumption.

i7-13700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 700% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i7-2629M is a notebook processor while Core i7-13700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2629M and Core i7-13700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2629M
Core i7-2629M
Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Core i7-2629M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 490 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2629M or Core i7-13700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.