Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Core i7-2617M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2617M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.06
Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.30
+22.6%

Core 2 Quad Q8400 outperforms Core i7-2617M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24332283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency5.901.30
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)19 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s1333 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size149 mm22x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors624 Million456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2617M 1.06
Core 2 Quad Q8400 1.30
+22.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2617M 1687
Core 2 Quad Q8400 2066
+22.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2617M 419
+27.7%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 328

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2617M 890
Core 2 Quad Q8400 897
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 1.30
Recency 3 January 2011 19 April 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 95 Watt

i7-2617M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 458.8% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q8400, on the other hand, has a 22.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

The Core 2 Quad Q8400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2617M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2617M is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2617M and Core 2 Quad Q8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2617M
Core i7-2617M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2617M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1347 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2617M or Core 2 Quad Q8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.