Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Core i7-2610UE
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-2610UE outperforms Core 2 Duo P8400 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2538 | 2841 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 4.93 | 2.04 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $317 | $209 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.26 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 1066 MHz |
| Multiplier | 15 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 624 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.89 | 0.54 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
i7-2610UE has a 64.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 47.1% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-2610UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8400 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and Core 2 Duo P8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
