Celeron J3455 vs i7-2610UE

Place in the ranking	2540	2192
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	0.15
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i7	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	4.95	13.44
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$317	$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J3455 has 650% better value for money than i7-2610UE.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	no data	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	2.3 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	15	15
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	624 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	no data	FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Smart Response	no data	-
GPIO	no data	+
Smart Connect	no data	-
HD Audio	no data	+
RST	no data	-

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	no data	+
Secure Boot	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
Identity Protection	-	+
OS Guard	no data	-
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
VT-i	no data	-
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1333	DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size	16 GB	8 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 3000	Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory	no data	8 GB
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Clear Video	no data	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	750 MHz
Execution Units	no data	12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+
MIPI-DSI	no data	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	+
OpenGL	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455.

PCIe version	no data	2.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	6
USB revision	no data	2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports	no data	2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	no data	2
Number of USB ports	no data	8
Integrated LAN	no data	-
UART	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.89

Celeron J3455 1.42
+59.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2610UE 1409

Celeron J3455 2256
+60.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.89	1.42
Integrated graphics card	0.66	0.77
Physical cores	2	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	10 Watt

Celeron J3455 has a 59.6% higher aggregate performance score, 16.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2610UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2610UE is a notebook processor while Celeron J3455 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and Celeron J3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.