Celeron B815 vs i7-2610UE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2538not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.92no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1516
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors624 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2610UE 1409
+92.7%
Celeron B815 731

Pros & cons summary


Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

i7-2610UE has 100% more threads, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and Celeron B815, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
Intel Celeron B815
Celeron B815

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 249 votes

Rate Celeron B815 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or Celeron B815, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.