Xeon w7-2555X vs i7-13790F
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 149 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 56.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 42.45 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 10 February 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $441 | $1,069 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) | 33.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 75 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 February 2023 | 24 August 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 14 |
| Threads | 24 | 28 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 210 Watt |
i7-13790F has 14.3% more physical cores, and 223.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon w7-2555X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 16.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-13790F is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-2555X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13790F and Xeon w7-2555X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
