Celeron 600 vs i7-13700F

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency35.71no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Timna
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz0.6 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)32 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)128 KB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm180 nm
Die size257 mm2129 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700370S
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel i752

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13700F 38958
+26402%
Celeron 600 147

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 1
Threads 24 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

i7-13700F has 1500% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

Celeron 600, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700F and Celeron 600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F
Intel Celeron 600
Celeron 600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 490 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700F or Celeron 600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.