EPYC 9454 vs i7-12700KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-12700KF
2021
12 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
22.02
EPYC 9454
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 290 Watt
61.32
+178%

EPYC 9454 outperforms Core i7-12700KF by a whopping 178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.177.42
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.3619.64
Architecture codenameAlder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date27 October 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$384$5,225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-12700KF has 468% better value for money than EPYC 9454.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads2096
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz2.75 GHz
Bus typeDMI 4.0no data
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier3627.5
L1 cache384 KB3 MB
L2 cache2 MB48 MB
L3 cache1 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size215.25 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-12700KF 22.02
EPYC 9454 61.32
+178%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-12700KF 34326
EPYC 9454 95582
+178%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.02 61.32
Recency 27 October 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 12 48
Threads 20 96
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 290 Watt

i7-12700KF has 132% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9454, on the other hand, has a 178.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 380% more threads.

The EPYC 9454 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-12700KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-12700KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 9454 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 9454, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-12700KF
Core i7-12700KF
AMD EPYC 9454
EPYC 9454

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1135 votes

Rate Core i7-12700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9454 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-12700KF or EPYC 9454, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.