Celeron N6211 vs i5-L16G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-L16G7
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
2.14
+50.7%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.42

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms Celeron N6211 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18562197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Ice LakeElkhart Lake
Power efficiency28.8120.59
Architecture codenameLakefield (2020)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release dateJune 2020 (4 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads52
Base clock speed1.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
Number of transistors4,050 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFC-CSP1016BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4X-4267DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth34 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units64no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDX12no data
OpenGLOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-L16G7 2.14
+50.7%
Celeron N6211 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-L16G7 3386
+50.8%
Celeron N6211 2245

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-L16G7 4079
+51.3%
Celeron N6211 2696

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-L16G7 9003
+91.8%
Celeron N6211 4693

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-L16G7 28.6
+73.6%
Celeron N6211 49.66

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-L16G7 3
+92.7%
Celeron N6211 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-L16G7 255
+99.2%
Celeron N6211 128

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-L16G7 90
+17.8%
Celeron N6211 76

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-L16G7 1.42
+46.4%
Celeron N6211 0.97

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-L16G7 1634
+93.5%
Celeron N6211 844

Blender(-)

i5-L16G7 2027
Celeron N6211 3767
+85.9%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-L16G7 827
+48.7%
Celeron N6211 556

7-Zip Single

i5-L16G7 3211
+23.8%
Celeron N6211 2593

7-Zip

i5-L16G7 7587
+90.9%
Celeron N6211 3974

WebXPRT 3

i5-L16G7 125
+39.6%
Celeron N6211 89

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 1.42
Integrated graphics card 5.58 1.39
Physical cores 5 2
Threads 5 2
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

i5-L16G7 has a 50.7% higher aggregate performance score, 301.4% faster integrated GPU, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-L16G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-L16G7 is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-L16G7 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Core i5-L16G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-L16G7 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.