Xeon Gold 6438N vs i5-9400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.19
Xeon Gold 6438N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.49
+457%

Xeon Gold 6438N outperforms Core i5-9400F by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1090115
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.6325.41
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency8.6815.34
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6438N has 164% better value for money than i5-9400F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads664
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache385 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 6.19
Xeon Gold 6438N 34.49
+457%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400F 9469
Xeon Gold 6438N 52789
+457%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.19 34.49
Recency 7 January 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 6 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

i5-9400F has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6438N, on the other hand, has a 457.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 433.3% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6438N is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6438N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Xeon Gold 6438N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Xeon Gold 6438N
Xeon Gold 6438N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56571 vote

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6438N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Xeon Gold 6438N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.