EPYC 4564P vs i5-9400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.98
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.21
+556%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Core i5-9400F by a whopping 556% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking109472
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.1053.38
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency8.6721.74
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4564P has 487% better value for money than i5-9400F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache385 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size149 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 5.98
EPYC 4564P 39.21
+556%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400F 9470
EPYC 4564P 62061
+555%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.98 39.21
Recency 7 January 2019 21 May 2024
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 6 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

i5-9400F has 161.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 555.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9400F in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56630 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.