Xeon W-3235 vs i5-9400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400
2018
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.90
Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.10
+173%

Xeon W-3235 outperforms Core i5-9400 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1101412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.2517.71
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency8.598.46
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$1,398

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3235 has 115% better value for money than i5-9400.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads624
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2933
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)12 MB
L3 cache9 MB (shared)19.25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400 5.90
Xeon W-3235 16.10
+173%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400 9372
Xeon W-3235 25578
+173%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-9400 1401
Xeon W-3235 1446
+3.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-9400 4824
Xeon W-3235 10445
+117%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.90 16.10
Recency 19 October 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 6 24
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

i5-9400 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3235, on the other hand, has a 172.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9400 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400 and Xeon W-3235, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1011 votes

Rate Core i5-9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400 or Xeon W-3235, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.