Core i9-14900F vs Core i5-8350U
Aggregate performance score
i9-14900F outperforms i5-8350U by a whopping 677% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1381 | 121 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 57.41 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) | Raptor Lake-R |
| Release date | 21 August 2017 (6 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $297 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 5.8 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 123 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1356 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.01 | 31.16 |
| Recency | 21 August 2017 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-8350U has 333.3% lower power consumption.
i9-14900F, on the other hand, has a 677.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i9-14900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-8350U in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-8350U is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8350U and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
