Ryzen Embedded 8645HS vs i5-7400T

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1643not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.71no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency8.00no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$187no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon 760M
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 3.10 14.90
Recency 3 January 2017 2 April 2024
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

i5-7400T has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, on the other hand, has 380.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-7400T is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded 8645HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7400T and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7400T
Core i5-7400T
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS
Ryzen Embedded 8645HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 115 votes

Rate Core i5-7400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8645HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7400T or Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.