Xeon X3380 vs Core i5-7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7400
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.54
+113%

i5-7400 outperforms Xeon X3380 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14641990
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)no data
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHzno data
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socket1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7400 3.54
+113%
Xeon X3380 1.66

Core i5-7400 outperforms Xeon X3380 by 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-7400 5471
+113%
Xeon X3380 2568

Core i5-7400 outperforms Xeon X3380 by 113% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.54 1.66
Recency 3 January 2017 1 January 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

i5-7400 has a 113.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3380 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-7400 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7400 and Xeon X3380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7400
Core i5-7400
Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2441 vote

Rate Core i5-7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7400 or Xeon X3380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.