Opteron 4334 vs i5-680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-680
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.67
Opteron 4334
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.49
+49.1%

Opteron 4334 outperforms Core i5-680 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20751760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.162.48
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Seoul (2012)
Release date19 April 2010 (14 years ago)4 December 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$272no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.65V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1156C32
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-680 1.67
Opteron 4334 2.49
+49.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-680 2647
Opteron 4334 3949
+49.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 2.49
Recency 19 April 2010 4 December 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 95 Watt

i5-680 has 30.1% lower power consumption.

Opteron 4334, on the other hand, has a 49.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Opteron 4334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-680 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-680 is a desktop processor while Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-680 and Opteron 4334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-680
Core i5-680
AMD Opteron  4334
Opteron 4334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 50 votes

Rate Core i5-680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 4334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-680 or Opteron 4334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.