Athlon 240GE vs i5-660

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-660
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.51
Athlon 240GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.85
+88.7%

Athlon 240GE outperforms Core i5-660 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21401667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.103.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.967.71
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)21 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 240GE has 3320% better value for money than i5-660.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon Vega 3
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-660 1.51
Athlon 240GE 2.85
+88.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-660 2397
Athlon 240GE 4527
+88.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 2.85
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.98
Recency 7 January 2010 21 December 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 240GE has a 88.7% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 108.6% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 240GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-660 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-660 and Athlon 240GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-660
Core i5-660
AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 107 votes

Rate Core i5-660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-660 or Athlon 240GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.