Ultra 7 265F vs i5-650

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.93no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.83no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11561851
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265F has 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-650 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-650
Core i5-650
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1013 votes

Rate Core i5-650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-650 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.