Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Core i5-650

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.93no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.83no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s667 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156no data
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-650 2249
+227%
Core 2 Duo T5850 687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-650 454
+107%
Core 2 Duo T5850 219

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-650 929
+179%
Core 2 Duo T5850 333

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 1 October 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 34 Watt

i5-650 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T5850, on the other hand, has 114.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-650 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T5850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-650 and Core 2 Duo T5850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-650
Core i5-650
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
Core 2 Duo T5850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1013 votes

Rate Core i5-650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 24 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-650 or Core 2 Duo T5850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.