Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs i5-6442EQ
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1680 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.40 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 10.68 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | no data |
| Release date | 12 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $250 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 19 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 October 2015 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 80 Watt |
i5-6442EQ has 220% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6442EQ and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
