Celeron G3950 vs i5-6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6400
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.41
+134%
Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.46

Core i5-6400 outperforms Celeron G3950 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15652178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.782.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.962.71
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date2 July 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$187$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 263% better value for money than i5-6400.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier2730
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency950 MHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6400 3.41
+134%
Celeron G3950 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6400 5417
+133%
Celeron G3950 2322

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.41 1.46
Integrated graphics card 2.60 1.85
Recency 2 July 2015 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 51 Watt

i5-6400 has a 133.6% higher aggregate performance score, 40.5% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G3950, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 27.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6400 and Celeron G3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6400
Core i5-6400
Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1249 votes

Rate Core i5-6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6400 or Celeron G3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.