Xeon E-2378G vs i5-520UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-520UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.57
Xeon E-2378G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
13.32
+2237%

Xeon E-2378G outperforms Core i5-520UM by a whopping 2237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2828564
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency3.0015.76
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.07 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported21

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @60 Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 60 Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @ 60 Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1644

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-520UM 0.57
Xeon E-2378G 13.32
+2237%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-520UM 908
Xeon E-2378G 21153
+2230%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 13.32
Integrated graphics card 0.77 4.56
Recency 7 January 2010 8 September 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 80 Watt

i5-520UM has 344.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2378G, on the other hand, has a 2236.8% higher aggregate performance score, 492.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E-2378G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-520UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-520UM is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2378G is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520UM and Xeon E-2378G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-520UM
Core i5-520UM
Intel Xeon E-2378G
Xeon E-2378G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i5-520UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon E-2378G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-520UM or Xeon E-2378G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.