Athlon PRO 300U vs i5-520UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-520UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.57
Athlon PRO 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
+351%

Athlon PRO 300U outperforms Core i5-520UM by a whopping 351% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28111728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.0016.21
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.07 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier824
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size81+114 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288FP5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-520UM 0.57
Athlon PRO 300U 2.57
+351%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-520UM 908
Athlon PRO 300U 4080
+349%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 2.57
Recency 7 January 2010 8 April 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon PRO 300U has a 350.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Athlon PRO 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-520UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520UM and Athlon PRO 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-520UM
Core i5-520UM
AMD Athlon PRO 300U
Athlon PRO 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i5-520UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon PRO 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-520UM or Athlon PRO 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.