A10-4657M vs i5-520UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-520UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.57
A10-4657M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.11
+94.7%

A10-4657M outperforms Core i5-520UM by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28132397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD A-Series
Power efficiency3.003.00
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.07 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1288BGA
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 7660G
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-520UM 0.57
A10-4657M 1.11
+94.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-520UM 908
A10-4657M 1759
+93.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 1.11
Recency 7 January 2010 1 April 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

i5-520UM has 94.4% lower power consumption.

A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 94.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores.

The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-520UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520UM and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-520UM
Core i5-520UM
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i5-520UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-520UM or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.