Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs i5-520E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 524 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $210 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 18 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 16 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 81 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 382 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1066 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 January 2010 | 23 May 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520E and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.