Ryzen 3 3200G vs i5-4670T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-4670T
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.90
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.66
+60.7%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i5-4670T by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16711310
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.378.90
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency5.886.54
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$220$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3200G has 2305% better value for money than i5-4670T.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size177 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4670T 2.90
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.66
+60.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-4670T 4441
Ryzen 3 3200G 7129
+60.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-4670T 982
Ryzen 3 3200G 1075
+9.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-4670T 2552
Ryzen 3 3200G 3063
+20%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 4.66
Integrated graphics card 1.84 4.50
Recency 2 June 2013 12 June 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i5-4670T has 44.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, has a 60.7% higher aggregate performance score, 144.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4670T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4670T and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4670T
Core i5-4670T
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 15 votes

Rate Core i5-4670T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3089 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4670T or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.