Core i3-N300 vs Core i5-4670
Aggregate performance score
i3-N300 outperforms i5-4670 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1462 | 1146 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.03 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Alder Lake-N |
| Release date | 2 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $360 | no data |
| Current price | $69 (0.2x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4600 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-N300 outperforms Core i5-4670 by 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-N300 outperforms Core i5-4670 by 44% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.54 | 5.12 |
| Recency | 2 June 2013 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 7 Watt |
i3-N300 has a 44.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-N300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4670 in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-4670 is a desktop processor while Core i3-N300 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4670 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
