Pentium M 765 vs Core i5-4590
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1492 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 49 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.44 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core i5 (Desktop) | Pentium M |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 April 2014 (10 years ago) | October 2004 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $202 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 84 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1400 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1150 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i5-4590 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 199% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 21 Watt |
i5-4590 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 765, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i5-4590 is a desktop processor while Pentium M 765 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4590 and Pentium M 765, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
