Celeron M 390 vs i5-4400E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1895 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 | Celeron M |
Power efficiency | 5.22 | no data |
Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
Release date | 1 October 2013 (11 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $266 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB L2 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 130 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 960 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FCBGA1364 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | no data | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 21 Watt |
i5-4400E has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 76.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4400E and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.