EPYC 7F52 vs i5-430UM
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 187 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.45 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.85 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 9 | 35 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors | no data |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2010 | 14 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 155 Watt |
i5-430UM has 761.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7F52, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-430UM is a notebook processor while EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-430UM and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
