Celeron B710 vs i5-430UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-430UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.39
+457%
Celeron B710
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.07

Core i5-430UM outperforms Celeron B710 by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30003389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency2.050.19
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70

Detailed specifications

Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier916
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288PGA988,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-430UM 0.39
+457%
Celeron B710 0.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-430UM 627
+492%
Celeron B710 106

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 0.07
Recency 20 June 2010 19 June 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

i5-430UM has a 457.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

Celeron B710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

The Core i5-430UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B710 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-430UM and Celeron B710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-430UM
Core i5-430UM
Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 9 votes

Rate Core i5-430UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 85 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-430UM or Celeron B710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.