Atom Z3770 vs i5-430UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-430UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.39
Atom Z3770
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.46
+17.9%

Atom Z3770 outperforms Core i5-430UM by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30002920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency2.055.44
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$37

Detailed specifications

Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier9no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency500 MHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-430UM 0.39
Atom Z3770 0.46
+17.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-430UM 627
Atom Z3770 736
+17.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 0.46
Recency 20 June 2010 27 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 8 Watt

Atom Z3770 has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

The Atom Z3770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-430UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-430UM and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-430UM
Core i5-430UM
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 9 votes

Rate Core i5-430UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-430UM or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.