Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs i5-4250U
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2236 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 8.51 | no data |
Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Manchester (2005−2006) |
Release date | 4 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 31 May 2005 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $430 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 118 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 154 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1168 | 939 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
FDI | - | no data |
AMT | 9.5 | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Max video memory | 2 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3280x2000@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
PCI support | - | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 4 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated IDE | - | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 June 2013 | 31 May 2005 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 89 Watt |
i5-4250U has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-4250U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4250U and Athlon 64 X2 3600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.