Xeon L5530 vs i5-3570

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3570
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
3.11
+95.6%
Xeon L5530
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 60 Watt
1.59

Core i5-3570 outperforms Xeon L5530 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16182098
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.50no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.822.51
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Gainestown (2009−2010)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)9 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$231no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size133 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB144 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3570 3.11
+95.6%
Xeon L5530 1.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3570 4933
+95.6%
Xeon L5530 2522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 1.59
Recency 1 June 2012 9 August 2009
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 60 Watt

i5-3570 has a 95.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon L5530, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 28.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5530 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-3570 is a desktop processor while Xeon L5530 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3570 and Xeon L5530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3570
Core i5-3570
Intel Xeon L5530
Xeon L5530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3265 votes

Rate Core i5-3570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3570 or Xeon L5530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.