Celeron G1101 vs i5-3470T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3470T
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.93
+176%
Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.70

Core i5-3470T outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19652717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.160.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.120.89
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$210$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1101 has 506% better value for money than i5-3470T.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size93.6 mm281 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++

Security technologies

Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500Intel HD
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3470T 1.93
+176%
Celeron G1101 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3470T 3001
+176%
Celeron G1101 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 0.70
Recency 1 June 2012 7 January 2010
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 73 Watt

i5-3470T has a 175.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 108.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3470T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3470T and Celeron G1101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3470T
Core i5-3470T
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 68 votes

Rate Core i5-3470T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3470T or Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.